Compare performance (138 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 28,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Lexus LBX?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the burgeoning segment of compact SUVs, two models are catching the eye for 2024: the Kia Niro and the Lexus LBX. Both vehicles blend practicality with innovation, but which one offers the superior mix of performance, efficiency, and modern conveniences? In this article, we compare their technical details to help you decide which one might suit your needs better.
The Kia Niro offers a choice between a full hybrid and a plug-in hybrid setup. In terms of power, it provides two output options—129 HP and 171 HP, translating to 95 kW and 126 kW, respectively. It utilizes a dual-clutch automatic transmission for smooth gear changes and front-wheel drive for consistent handling. The car's acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from 11.3 seconds for the hybrid to 10.4 seconds for the plug-in variant.
In contrast, the Lexus LBX is available in a full hybrid configuration with a single output of 136 HP (100 kW). It features a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which offers a seamless driving experience. Buyers have the option between front-wheel and all-wheel drive, with the vehicle accelerating from 0-100 km/h in approximately 9.2 to 9.6 seconds. This makes it slightly faster than the Niro.
The Kia Niro shines in its eco-friendly credentials, especially the plug-in hybrid version, which offers a remarkable fuel consumption of just 0.8 L/100 km and an electric range of up to 65 km. Its full hybrid variant also performs well with a consumption of 4.4 L/100 km. The Niro's CO2 emissions are notably low, with figures ranging from 19 to 23 g/km.
The Lexus LBX has a commendable fuel consumption of 4.5 to 4.8 L/100 km and CO2 emissions between 102 and 109 g/km. While it can't match the electric range of a plug-in hybrid, it offers a practical balance of power and efficiency.
The Kia Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height, providing ample space for passengers and luggage. Its trunk capacity is generous with 451 liters for the hybrid and 348 liters for the plug-in hybrid. The Niro can comfortably seat five passengers, making it a practical choice for families.
The Lexus LBX is slightly more compact at 4190 mm in length but shares the same width at 1825 mm. It stands slightly taller at 1560 mm. The LBX offers a trunk capacity of 332 liters with all seats in place. It seats four occupants, focusing on a more luxurious interior experience.
If you're looking for a vehicle with an emphasis on electric efficiency and a practical interior, the Kia Niro's plug-in hybrid variant may be the best fit. Its excellent electric range and versatile seating are significant advantages for eco-conscious drivers.
However, for those prioritizing a premium feel and advanced drivetrain options, the Lexus LBX presents a compelling case. With the choice of all-wheel drive and a slightly faster acceleration, it offers a blend of luxury and performance, making it suitable for small families or individuals seeking comfort and capability.
Ultimately, both the Kia Niro and Lexus LBX bring their unique strengths to the compact SUV arena, and the decision will hinge on your specific priorities, whether it's efficiency, luxury, or a balance of both.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Lexus LBX is very slightly cheaper – starting at 28,300 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.5 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia Niro offers very slightly more power – delivering 138 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus LBX is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 9.2 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Niro delivers visibly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 185 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Lexus LBX is slightly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Lexus LBX carries marginally more – 475 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
The Kia Niro holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The Lexus LBX wraps premium touches and a surprisingly spacious cabin into a compact crossover that’s perfectly at home in town or heading out on longer drives. It wears the badge with quiet confidence, serving up a refined ride and clever packaging for buyers who want Lexus polish without shouting for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
28,300 - 40,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
102 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,365 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
185 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Lexus
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España