VS

Kia Picanto vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (68 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (15,100 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Volvo XC90?

Kia Picanto vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Kia Picanto

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Picanto

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia Picanto is significantly cheaper – starting at 15,100 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 59,228 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC90 uses 3.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Kia Picanto with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 338 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Kia Picanto takes 14.6 s. That’s about 9.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 573 Nm more.

Picanto

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Picanto is substantially lighter – 1,124 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 956 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries clearly more – 710 kg compared to 332 kg. That’s a difference of about 378 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £74,300
XC90

Volvo XC90

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 250 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Picanto and Kia Stonic are closely related but aimed at different needs: the Picanto is a pint-sized city hatch built for nimble urban driving and low running costs, while the Stonic is a small crossover that adds higher seating, extra boot space and a more rugged presence. This comparison …
Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
Kia Picanto
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Picanto

Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.

details
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_01
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_03
Kia Picanto X-Line_02
Kia_Picanto_MJ22_Innen_01

Reviews Kia Picanto

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Ffg
16 May 2026, 03:34:35

Ffggggggg ffg

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Fiat Panda
Kia Picanto
VS
The Fiat Panda and Kia Picanto are two of Europe’s most sensible city cars, offering affordable running costs and easy maneuverability for urban life. The Panda emphasizes practicality and interior space with a rugged, no-nonsense character, while the Picanto delivers sharper handling, more modern …
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Picanto
VS
Comparing the Dacia Sandero and the Kia Picanto: both are budget-friendly small cars but they appeal to different priorities — the Sandero emphasizes space and low running costs, while the Picanto focuses on compact agility and city-friendly maneuverability. If you need roomy practicality and …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC90
VS
The Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC90 both offer three-row seating but aim at different buyers: the 5008 is a practical, value-focused family SUV while the XC90 is a premium, safety-led luxury SUV. This comparison will focus on space, comfort, performance, efficiency and running costs to help you decide …
Kia Picanto
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Kia Picanto is a cheeky city sparrow: tiny, cheap to buy and park, and surprisingly fun to hustle through tight streets if you don’t need boot space or long‑distance refinement. The Toyota Yaris, meanwhile, feels grown‑up by comparison — roomier, safer and available as an economical hybrid, so …
Kia Picanto
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,100 - 19,500 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 134 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,124 - 1,131 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
255 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,595 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
253 - 332 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
68 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
96 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
50 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Kia
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Kia Picanto have?

The Kia Picanto is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.