Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Kia XCeed vs Mitsubishi ASX - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 20600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Mitsubishi ASX?
XCeed
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi ASX has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £ , while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2572 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
ASX
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a somewhat edge – offering 180 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.50 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls slight stronger with 270 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
XCeed
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is hardly perceptible lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers to a small extent more room – 484 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs somewhat better – up to 1596 L, which is about 218 L more than the Kia XCeed.
When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed hardly perceptible takes the win – 479 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £20,600
Mitsubishi ASX
Kia XCeed
Mitsubishi ASX
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Kia XCeed
4.8 (2 Reviews)
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
details
Mitsubishi ASX
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Kia XCeed
Mitsubishi ASX
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 33000 £
|
Price
20600 - 32500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
144 - 155 g/km
|
co2
99 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
|
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
426 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1826 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
|
|
Payload
471 - 479 kg
|
Payload
397 - 449 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
|
|
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?
The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.