Compare performance (180 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Kia XCeed and Nissan Juke stand out with their unique blend of style, performance, and technological prowess. Both hail from the 2024 model year and offer distinct experiences for drivers seeking versatility and efficiency. Let's dive into the specifics that set these two models apart.
The Kia XCeed offers a sleek, elongated design measuring 4395 mm in length, 1826 mm in width, and 1495 mm in height. This design provides ample space with a trunk capacity of 426 liters, making it an attractive choice for families and travel enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Nissan Juke, slightly more compact with a length of 4210 mm, a width of 1800 mm, and a height of 1593 mm, adds a flair of sportiness to its exterior. Its trunk space varies between 422 to 354 liters, depending on the version selected, offering versatility for various needs.
The Kia XCeed is powered by petrol engines with power outputs ranging from 100 to 140 HP, providing drivers with dynamic options depending on their driving style. It offers both a Manual Gearbox and a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission, hitting a top speed between 174 and 195 km/h. In terms of efficiency, it consumes about 6.3 to 6.5 L/100km with CO2 emissions rated between 143 and 148 g/km.
The Nissan Juke offers both petrol and full hybrid engine options with power ranging from 114 to 143 HP. It also features multiple transmission options, including a Manual and an Automatic Gearbox. The Juke reaches a top speed between 166 and 180 km/h, depending on the variant. It excels in efficiency, especially the hybrid variant, which boasts fuel consumption as low as 4.7 L/100km and CO2 emissions at a remarkable 107 g/km.
Both SUVs are equipped with front-wheel drive, ensuring a stable and predictable performance on various road conditions. The Kia XCeed's torque ranges from 172 to 253 Nm, which offers a balanced driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke maintains a steady 200 Nm across its engine options, providing consistent power delivery for urban and suburban environments.
Technology and innovation play a crucial role in both models. The Kia XCeed offers progressive features synonymous with modern driving, including advanced driver assistance systems and connective technologies that appeal to tech-savvy drivers. The Nissan Juke, known for its iconic design, incorporates an array of innovative features like its hybrid powertrain, contributing to reduced environmental impact, and cutting-edge infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience.
The Kia XCeed and Nissan Juke both bring remarkable strengths to the table. The XCeed might appeal more to drivers prioritizing interior space and a slightly more powerful output. In contrast, the Nissan Juke stands out with its environmental efficiency and hybrid capabilities, making it a superb choice for the eco-conscious driver. Ultimately, both vehicles offer a compelling package that reflects the diverse needs and desires of today's automotive enthusiasts.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Juke is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Kia XCeed costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,749 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed offers noticeably more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia XCeed is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.5 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia XCeed delivers clearly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is very slightly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,351 kg. The difference is around 77 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Kia XCeed offers only slightly more boot space – 426 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
When it comes to payload, the Kia XCeed carries slightly more – 485 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
The Kia XCeed holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
|
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
143 - 155 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 426 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,826 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
471 - 485 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España