Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Juke?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Juke has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3386 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Juke
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls noticeable stronger with 290 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is hardly perceptible lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 42 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Juke performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1305 L, which is about 22 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Nissan Juke
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.