Ford VS Nissan

In the competitive crossover segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its dynamic styling and engaging driving experience, appealing to those who seek a sporty feel. Conversely, the Nissan Juke maintains its quirky design and offers a spacious interior, making it a practical choice for urban drivers. While both models boast advanced technology and efficient engines, the decision ultimately comes down to personal preference in aesthetics and driving dynamics.

Ford

Nissan

The compact SUV segment has seen remarkable growth, with Ford's Puma and Nissan's Juke standing out as notable contenders. Both vehicles blend style, modern technology, and practicality, but how do they stack up against each other? This comparison dives into the technical aspects and innovations of the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke, helping you decide which model suits your lifestyle better.

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to looks, both vehicles offer a sporty profile that appeals to urban drivers. The Ford Puma measures 4186 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and has a height of 1550 mm. The Nissan Juke, while slightly longer at 4210 mm, matches Ford's width but is taller at 1593 mm. This extra height in the Juke may provide a more commanding view of the road, but the Puma presents a sleeker silhouette overall.

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Puma is available with a choice of petrol mild-hybrid and electric engines, with power output ranging from 125 to 168 HP. Notably, the electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 376 km on a single charge, and the acceleration can achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds. In contrast, the Nissan Juke features petrol and full hybrid options, offering power levels from 114 to 143 HP. With a slightly slower 0-100 km/h time of 10.1 seconds, it sacrifices some acceleration for efficiency, especially considering its lower fuel consumption rate of 4.7 L/100 km in the hybrid variant.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Speaking of efficiency, the Puma showcases a fuel consumption range of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km for its petrol engines, while its electric model's consumption stands at 13.1 kWh/100 km. The Nissan Juke, on the other hand, offers slightly higher consumption figures—5.8 to 6 L/100 km—with its traditional petrol engines. The Juke’s hybrid model proves more environmentally friendly with a CO2 emission level of 107 g/km, while the Puma varies from 121 to 136 g/km depending on the engine.

Interior and Practicality

In terms of interior space, both models cater to five occupants comfortably. The Ford Puma provides impressive trunk capacity of 456 to 523 liters, making it a better choice for families or those who require extra storage. The Nissan Juke’s trunk space is notably smaller, offering up to 422 liters. Both vehicles boast user-friendly infotainment systems, with Ford incorporating the latest technology to enhance the driving experience, including a FordPass app for remote features.

Innovative Features

One of the star innovations in the Ford Puma is its advanced hybrid technology paired with the option of a hybrid-like electric range. Ford has also integrated a host of driver-assist technologies to ensure safety and comfort on the road. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke proudly offers the Nissan Intelligent Mobility suite, providing features such as ProPILOT Assist, which makes highway driving easier and safer.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs. If practicality and advanced hybrid technology are at the top of your list, the Ford Puma has the edge. Alternatively, if you're looking for a stylish, compact SUV with strong hybrid efficiency, the Nissan Juke could be your perfect match. Both vehicles offer a blend of technology, comfort, and performance, ensuring that either choice will make for an exciting driving experience.