VS

Nissan Juke vs Peugeot 2008 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Peugeot 2008?

Nissan Juke vs Peugeot 2008: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
details

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Juke

Introduction: A Clash of the Compact SUVs

As the compact SUV market continues to heat up, two contenders, the Nissan Juke and the Peugeot 2008, stand out with their unique designs and compelling features. Both vehicles bring a mix of modern styling, innovative technology, and efficient powertrains, making the choice a bit more challenging for potential buyers. In this article, we will compare the two models across various aspects, from technical specifications to innovations, to help you make an informed decision.

2008

Performance Specs: Power on the Pavement

Under the hood, the Nissan Juke offers a range of petrol and full hybrid engine options, delivering power outputs of 114 HP and 143 HP respectively. These engines, combined with a choice of manual or dual-clutch automatic transmissions, provide a responsive and enjoyable driving experience. The Juke can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 10.1 seconds and boasts a top speed of 180 km/h.

In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 presents a slightly different lineup with petrol MHEV and electric options. With power outputs ranging from 101 HP to a robust 156 HP, the 2008 can achieve impressive acceleration times, with some variants reaching 0 to 100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds. Its top speed of 206 km/h places it ahead of the Juke, making for a more thrilling driving experience.

Juke

Fuel Efficiency: A Green Choice

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both the Juke and 2008 excel in their respective categories. The Nissan Juke offers admirable consumption rates ranging from 4.7 to 6 L/100km, depending on the engine variant. This is a respectable figure for a compact SUV, ensuring that drivers can enjoy long journeys without frequent stops at the pump.

The Peugeot 2008 takes the lead with its electric variant, which achieves an impressive electric range of up to 406 km. Its petrol engines also maintain efficiency, consuming between 5 and 5.7 L/100km. This innovative approach positions the 2008 as an appealing choice for environmentally conscious consumers.

2008

Interior and Comfort: Space to Breathe

Inside, both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, but the interior aesthetics and functionalities differ significantly. The Nissan Juke boasts a trunk capacity of 422 liters, offering ample space for everyday needs. Its distinct interior design and customizable features add a touch of personality, making it appealing to a younger audience.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 slightly exceeds its competitor with a trunk capacity of 434 liters. The interior is characterized by a sleek and modern design, featuring the latest technology and a user-friendly interface. Both vehicles offer a host of tech features, but the 2008's advanced infotainment system and optional connected services give it a slight edge in this department.

Juke

Safety and Technology: Innovation at Its Best

Safety is paramount in today’s automotive industry. The Nissan Juke delivers multiple safety features, including a suite of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) such as emergency braking and lane-keeping assistance, ensuring peace of mind on the road.

The Peugeot 2008 matches these offerings with key safety technologies and additional functions such as adaptive cruise control and parking assistance. Both vehicles have received commendable ratings in crash tests, reinforcing their commitment to passenger safety.

2008

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan Juke and the Peugeot 2008 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If you are looking for a sportier drive with a more distinctive design, the Juke could be the right choice for you. However, if eco-friendliness, advanced technology, and slightly more trunk space are higher on your list, the 2008 might be the better option.

Both models showcase innovative features and reliable performance, making them worthy of consideration in the competitive compact SUV market. Test-driving each vehicle could help you discover which SUV aligns with your lifestyle and driving needs.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
In the red corner, the Peugeot 2008 brings compact crossover swagger and city-ready practicality; in the blue, the Peugeot 308 delivers a sportier, more refined hatchback experience. We pit them head-to-head to find out which Peugeot deserves your driveway — the raised, versatile 2008 or the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Juke is moderately cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Peugeot 2008 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

2008

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 2008 offers only slightly more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 2008 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 2008 delivers noticeably more torque with 270 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is only slightly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers marginally more boot space – 434 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 2008 carries barely more – 447 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 2008 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
2008

Peugeot 2008

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 405 km
details
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Peugeot 2008
VW Taigo
VS
In the fiercely competitive compact SUV segment, the Peugeot 2008 takes on the VW Taigo with its blend of style and practicality. The 2008 offers a sophisticated design and a tech-forward interior that appeals to those seeking a modern driving experience. On the other hand, the Taigo, with its …
Opel Mokka
Peugeot 2008
VS
Opel Mokka brings punchy engines, chunky SUV looks and a practical, straightforward cabin that’s easy to live with — ideal if you want fuss-free value and a touch of rugged charm. The Peugeot 2008 bets on style and tech, with a striking interior, nimble handling and the addictive i‑Cockpit layout, …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Citroën C3 Aircross and Peugeot 2008 go head-to-head with distinctive strengths. The Citroën C3 Aircross capitalizes on its unique, quirky design and spacious interior, making it an attractive option for families seeking comfort and practicality. …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Nissan Juke and Toyota Yaris Cross stand out for their distinctive designs and dynamic performance. The Juke offers a more sport-oriented driving experience with its turbocharged engine and agile handling, while the Yaris Cross impresses with its …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and Peugeot 2008 present a captivating showdown in the compact SUV segment, each appealing to drivers with distinct tastes and preferences. The Omoda 5 boasts a sleek design coupled with innovative technology, making it a strong contender for tech-savvy urban explorers. Meanwhile, the …
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
434 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,770 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
407 - 447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Peugeot
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.