Compare performance (180 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 28,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or SsangYong Musso?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia XCeed is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the SsangYong Musso costs 28,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia XCeed uses 6.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Musso offers a bit more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Musso delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia XCeed is clearly lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 694 kg.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries considerably more – 1,010 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 525 kg.
The Kia XCeed comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
detailsThe Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
|
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
143 - 155 g/km
|
co2
221 - 245 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
426 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
|
|
Width
1,826 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
471 - 485 kg
|
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
SsangYong
|