Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs MG Cyberster comparison
Compare performance (269 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or MG Cyberster?
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs MG Cyberster: Key differences
Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is noticeably cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,420 £.
As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers considerably more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 440 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Cyberster
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 241 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers visibly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm more.
Range Rover Evoque
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is only slightly lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 168 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers significantly more boot space – 472 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 272 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries clearly more – 600 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 450 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MG Cyberster holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,700
MG Cyberster
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
MG Cyberster
The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
200 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
150 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
MG
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.