Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (243 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Kuga is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,043 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers marginally more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 1 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers very slightly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers considerably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is moderately lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries marginally more – 600 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Kuga
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Ford Kuga
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.