Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Renault Kangoo comparison
Compare performance (269 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or Renault Kangoo?
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Renault Kangoo: Key differences
Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Kangoo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.
Range Rover Evoque
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is visibly lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 303 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers markedly more boot space – 775 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 303 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries only slightly more – 610 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,300
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Renault Kangoo
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
25,700 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
136 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 1,830 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 775 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.