Compare performance (269 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or VW Tayron?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of SUVs, the Range Rover Evoque and VW Tayron stand tall, offering luxury, performance, and innovation. These two vehicles, with their distinctive designs and cutting-edge technologies, cater to drivers seeking a blend of style and practicality. Here, we dive into the detailed comparison between these two impressive models.
Starting with dimensions, the VW Tayron outstretches the Range Rover Evoque, measuring 4792 mm in length compared to the Evoque's 4371 mm. The Tayron also boasts a larger trunk capacity of 885 liters, ideal for those who require more cargo space, whereas the Evoque provides 472 liters. Both models offer a generous amount of space for five passengers, emphasizing comfort and convenience amidst the bustle of urban or off-road adventures.
The engine types for both vehicles offer a range of options. The Range Rover Evoque provides a choice between Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, and a Plugin Hybrid. Horsepower varies from 160 to 269 HP, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranging between 10.3 and 7.2 seconds. The Tayron, on the other hand, offers Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, and Petrol engines with power up to 272 HP and an acceleration that goes from 9.7 to as brisk as 6.1 seconds.
When it comes to fuel efficiency and environmental impact, both models present conscientious options. The Range Rover Evoque Plugin Hybrid delivers an impressive consumption rate of 1.4 L/100km and an electric range of 68 km. Meanwhile, the Tayron excels with its Plugin Hybrids, boasting a consumption as low as 0.4 L/100km and extending the electric range to an outstanding 126 km. Both brands aim to reduce CO2 emissions, with the Evoque’s output starting at 31 g/km and the Tayron’s at a mere 9 g/km.
Innovation is a common thread in the development of these SUVs. The Range Rover Evoque is known for its luxurious interior and off-road capabilities, enriched with an array of technology features designed to enhance the driving experience. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its modern design, dual-clutch automatic transmission, and a comprehensive infotainment system, offering both user-friendly navigation and entertainment.
Ultimately, deciding between the Range Rover Evoque and the VW Tayron depends on individual needs and preferences. If style, luxury, and off-road capability are your priority, the Evoque shines bright. However, if space, advanced hybrid technology, and top-tier performance appeal to you more, the Tayron is difficult to overlook. Both vehicles embody modern automotive excellence, inviting drivers to experience next-level driving dynamics.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW Tayron is barely cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,064 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Tayron uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the VW Tayron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 123 km, about 56 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Tayron offers marginally more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Tayron is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Tayron is barely lighter – 1,682 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 110 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Tayron offers significantly more boot space – 885 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 413 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries only slightly more – 600 kg compared to 573 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.
The VW Tayron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
40,200 - 56,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
33 - 192 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,682 - 1,948 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,853 - 1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
497 - 573 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, G
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España