Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (635 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (78600 £ vs 275400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Sport or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?
Range Rover Sport
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 78600 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 196800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Sport manages with 2.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L. The difference is about 13.30 L per 100 km.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a minimal edge – offering 635 HP compared to 600 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Rolls-Royce Cullinan pulls slightly stronger with 900 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Range Rover Sport
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is somewhat lighter – 2390 kg compared to 2660 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers to a small extent more room – 647 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.
When it comes to payload, Rolls-Royce Cullinan slight takes the win – 840 kg compared to 830 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £78,600
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
Price
275400 - 324600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
90 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
Curb weight
2660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
|
Length
4970 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2043 mm
|
Width
2000 mm
|
|
Height
1814 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
290 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
Is the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offered with different drivetrains?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.