Compare performance (404 HP vs 398 HP), boot space and price (62,000 £ vs 51,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Velar or BMW X3?
In the realm of premium SUVs, the BMW X3 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar present formidable options for enthusiasts and practical drivers alike. Each vehicle boasts a blend of luxury, performance, and advanced technology. In this head-to-head comparison, we delve into the specifications and innovations that set these two titans apart.
Both the BMW X3 and the Range Rover Velar flaunt their distinct stylistic charisma. The X3 measures between 4708mm and 4755mm in length, with a width spanning around 1891mm to 1920mm, and a height that varies between 1660mm to 1676mm. It’s a perfect example of BMW's ability to blend sporty aesthetics with elegance.
In contrast, the Velar's design is classic Land Rover—sophisticated yet muscular. It stretches slightly longer at 4797mm and slightly wider at 1933mm, with height dimensions of 1657mm to 1665mm. This contributed to the Velar's imposing road presence.
The BMW X3 offers a versatile range of engines including diesel, petrol, plug-in hybrid, and mild-hybrid options. Power outputs range from 184 HP to a formidable 510 HP, enabling 0-100km/h acceleration times from a modest 8.4 seconds to a blistering 3.8 seconds. With a diverse torque range of 300 Nm to 700 Nm, the X3 handles various driving situations with finesse.
Meanwhile, the Range Rover Velar showcases an equally impressive engine lineup, predominantly featuring mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. Engine power ranges from 204 HP up to 404 HP, and its acceleration capabilities span from 8.3 seconds to a swift 5.4 seconds for the 0-100km/h sprint. It holds a torque range from 430 Nm to 650 Nm.
Fuel efficiency is a key consideration for modern drivers. The X3 offers notable consumption figures taking center stage with an efficient 6 L/100km on certain diesel variants, while plug-in hybrids can reach as low as 2.1 L/100km combined with an electric range of up to 90 km.
The Velar also impresses with eco-friendliness, showcasing a leading consumption rate of 1.9 L/100km in its plug-in guise, offering an electric range of 61 km. Emission levels are competitive, with its CO2 emissions starting at 43 g/km. Both models exist in a range of CO2 efficiency classes, demonstrating their commitment to reducing their environmental footprint.
The BMW X3 is equipped with the latest in connectivity and driver assistance technologies. Features like intuitive interfaces, advanced driver-assistant systems, and premium quality interiors enhance the driving experience substantially.
The Range Rover Velar similarly offers cutting-edge innovations. Highlight features include its state-of-the-art infotainment system, comprehensive safety technologies, as well as luxurious interior touches that ensure comfort and convenience for driver and passengers alike.
The choice between the BMW X3 and the Range Rover Velar ultimately depends on what you prioritize: whether it’s BMW’s reputation for driving excitement or Land Rover’s unparalleled off-road and luxury prestige. Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technology and deliver outstanding performance, ensuring whichever vehicle you choose, you're guaranteed an exceptional driving experience.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BMW X3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 51,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X3 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW X3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 88 km, about 30 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers barely more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 398 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers very slightly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X3 is marginally lighter – 1,930 kg compared to 2,003 kg. The difference is around 73 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar carries very slightly more – 587 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.
The BMW X3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
|
Price
51,300 - 72,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
58 km
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
103 - 228 g/km
|
co2
64 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 - 65 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
|
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,755 mm
|
|
Width
1,933 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,660 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,700 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Payload
570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España