VS

Lexus NX vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (46,000 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lexus NX or Mazda CX-5?

Lexus NX vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Lexus NX

4.8 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

NX

Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5: a direct comparison for real buyers

Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 sit on opposite sides of the same compact‑SUV aisle: one pitches premium calm and hybrid efficiency, the other prioritises everyday space and straightforward usability. The Lexus NX feels like an intentional step up in material quality and drivetrain smoothness, while the Mazda CX‑5 answers with larger, more practical cabin and boot packaging. If you read spec sheets, the two can look close; in real life the trade is between measured refinement and usable volume. This page lays out how those differences play out for daily routines, family life and long drives.

CX-5

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Lexus NX presents an interior that reads premium the moment you close the door: tighter seams, softer touch points and a more restrained design language. The Mazda CX‑5 is cleanly laid out and pleasant to live with, but some surfaces and trim choices feel more utilitarian when your hand lands on them repeatedly. Lexus NX cabins tend to quiet conversations and feel more composed; Mazda CX‑5 cabins are airy and practical, which many buyers prefer when kids and cargo make durability a priority. The contrast is not just cosmetic — it affects how each car ages in daily use and how satisfying they are to live with week after week.

NX

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

The Lexus NX is tuned to be a motorway companion: it settles into long runs with minimal intrusion from wind and road noise and a suspension that favours composure over sport. The Mazda CX‑5 can travel comfortably too, but it reveals itself on long hauls with a livelier ride and a tendency to get louder when you ask the engine for hard acceleration. Lexus NX buyers will appreciate the relaxed, insulated feel for frequent commuters and tourers, while Mazda CX‑5 owners trade a touch more acoustic and engine presence for greater cabin space and a reassuring, supportive seat layout. That difference defines whether you reach the end of a long day feeling refreshed or simply merely relieved to have arrived.

CX-5

Practicality and family usability

The Mazda CX‑5 clearly leans into family life with wider rear doors, easier access and a very forgiving boot area that swallows awkward luggage without drama. The Lexus NX offers clever compartments and a well‑thought‑out layout, but the usable rear space and loadbed feel a bit tighter in everyday shuffling of prams, sports gear and grocery runs. Mazda CX‑5’s rear-seat flexibility and lower loading lip are real conveniences for parents and holiday planners, whereas Lexus NX owners will trade some cargo room for a quieter cabin and more refined finishes. If practical versatility matters more than premium touches, the CX‑5 is the more pragmatic companion.

NX

City friendliness and daily usability

In urban life the two take different approaches: the Lexus NX glides through traffic with smooth low‑speed manners and advanced parking aids, but its larger footprint and smaller rear window make tight parking and blind‑spot checks more work without the camera pack. The Mazda CX‑5 feels easier to live with in town thanks to sensible door apertures, good rear access and a more direct steering feel, yet its touchscreen‑heavy climate controls and less immediate infotainment shortcuts can irritate on short hops. Lexus NX buyers get a calmer, more insulated daily ride if they prioritise refinement; Mazda CX‑5 drivers get convenience and cargo practicality at the cost of some interface and acoustic compromises. Both cope with city life, but the CX‑5 does the chores while the NX makes them less wearing.

CX-5

Buyer fit: who should choose which

Choose the Lexus NX if your priority is a premium, quiet cabin, hybrid efficiency and a composed long‑distance cruiser that rewards calm, well‑appointed daily use. Pick the Mazda CX‑5 if you need roomy rear seats, a very usable boot and a straightforward, family‑friendly SUV that values practicality and modern connectivity. Lexus NX suits buyers who are willing to pay a premium for perceived quality and low running fuss; Mazda CX‑5 suits those who want everyday versatility and a smarter price-to-space balance. The technical comparison that follows will unpack how each car’s drivetrain and equipment choices shape these real‑world differences so you can match them to your priorities.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

NX

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Lexus NX costs 46,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,037 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lexus NX uses 2.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.1 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus NX offers clearly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus NX is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

NX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is moderately lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,805 kg. The difference is around 176 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lexus NX offers slightly more boot space – 545 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries somewhat more – 601 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lexus NX is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,000
NX

Lexus NX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 292 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.9 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 72 km
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Lexus NX

The Lexus NX wraps striking, chiseled styling around a cabin that feels more crafted living room than utility vehicle, with soft materials and user-friendly tech that give it genuine premium cachet. On the road it's composed and quietly confident, trading sporty pretensions for a refined, easygoing personality that will suit buyers who want luxury without fuss — with a little Lexus flair to make daily commutes feel special.

details

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

Price
46,000 - 63,400 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
72 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 134 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,805 - 2,065 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 - 515 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 292 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 215 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.