Is the Lexus NX offered with different drivetrains?

The Lexus NX is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Lexus NX?

Depending on the version, the Lexus NX delivers up to 309 HP.

How much fuel does the Lexus NX use?

On average, the Lexus NX consumes 2.90 L.

What is the electric driving range of the Lexus NX?

According to WLTP, the Lexus NX can travel up to 72 km on a single charge.

What is the top speed of the Lexus NX?

Depending on the model, top speed is 200 km/h.

How many liters of cargo space does the Lexus NX offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 545 L fit inside.

What are the Lexus NX’s length, width and height?

Length 4660 mm, width 1865 mm, height 1670 mm – those are the dimensions of the Lexus NX.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

Lexus NX vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

NX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Lexus NX has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 46000 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Lexus NX with 2.90 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Lexus NX performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 72 km, about 11 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 309 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus NX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Lexus NX tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

NX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Lexus NX is to a small extent lighter – 1805 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lexus NX offers decisively more room – 545 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 287 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – up to 1971 L, which is about 535 L more than the Lexus NX.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 clearly perceptible takes the win – 650 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Lexus NX

4.9 (5 Reviews)

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Costs and Consumption
Price 46000 - 64300 £	Price 48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km 2.9 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 72 km	Electric Range 61 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 65 - 134 g/km	co2 35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1805 - 2065 kg	Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 545 L	Trunk capacity 258 L
Length 4660 mm	Length 4995 mm
Width 1865 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1670 mm	Height 1714 mm
Max trunk capacity 1436 L	Max trunk capacity 1971 L
Payload 475 - 515 kg	Payload 649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail CVT	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 244 - 309 HP	Power HP 254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 8.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed 200 km/h	Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h
Torque -	Torque 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 179 - 227 kW	Power kW 187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity 2487 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3