VS

Lexus NX vs Mazda CX-80 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lexus NX or Mazda CX-80?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

NX @ toyota-media.de

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Lexus NX has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 46000 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Lexus NX with 2.90 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Lexus NX performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 72 km, about 11 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 309 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus NX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Lexus NX tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

NX @ toyota-media.de

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Lexus NX is to a small extent lighter – 1805 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lexus NX offers decisively more room – 545 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 287 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – up to 1971 L, which is about 535 L more than the Lexus NX.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 clearly perceptible takes the win – 650 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Lexus NX

5 (1)
rate

The Lexus NX embodies a sophisticated blend of striking design and luxurious comfort, providing an exceptional driving experience. Its hybrid powertrain offers seamless performance, ensuring both efficiency and a smooth ride. Inside, high-quality materials and innovative technology create an atmosphere of modern elegance and convenience.

details
73893-2021nxdplnx350hdynamic003 @ toyota-media.de
73959-2021nxdplnx350hstatic004 @ toyota-media.de
73960-2021nxdplnx350hstatic001 @ toyota-media.de
73857-2021nxdplnx350hdetail002 @ toyota-media.de
73863-2021nxdplnx350hdetail008 @ toyota-media.de

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style versus functionality, as both models cater to the needs of modern families.
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. Ultimately, both vehicles deliver strong performance, making the choice lean heavily on personal style and desired driving experience.
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-80
NX
CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
46000 - 64300 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
72 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 134 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1805 - 2065 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1670 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
1436 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
475 - 515 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
244 - 309 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 8.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
179 - 227 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
BMW X1
Lexus NX
VS
The BMW X1 and Lexus NX are both strong contenders in the luxury compact SUV segment, each offering distinct advantages to potential buyers. The BMW X1 excels with its dynamic handling and sporty performance, appealing to those who prioritize driving pleasure. In contrast, the Lexus NX impresses with its opulent interior and advanced safety features, catering to those who value comfort and technology in their daily drive.
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between the two may hinge on personal preference for sportiness versus practicality, but both models deliver solid performance in their respective strengths.
BYD Seal U
Lexus NX
VS
In the increasingly competitive SUV market, the BYD Seal U stands out with its striking design and advanced electric technology, offering impressive range and features at a more accessible price point compared to the Lexus NX. Meanwhile, the Lexus NX delivers a blend of luxury, reliability, and refined performance, appealing to those who prioritize a premium driving experience with a hybrid option. Ultimately, the decision between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for sustainability versus luxury comfort.
CUPRA Terramar
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty dynamics and aggressive styling, appealing to those who crave a performance-oriented ride. Conversely, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious experience, showcasing a sleek design and an emphasis on comfort and advanced technology. While the Terramar caters to driving enthusiasts, the NX prioritizes refinement and sophistication, making each an appealing choice for different types of buyers.
Lexus NX
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Lexus NX and Toyota Corolla Touring Sports cater to distinctly different driving experiences. The Lexus NX, a compact luxury SUV, offers an opulent interior with advanced tech features and a comfortable ride, appealing to those seeking premium comfort and style. In contrast, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports, a practical and reliable station wagon, focuses on fuel efficiency and versatility, making it an excellent choice for families and everyday commuting.
Lexus NX
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Lexus NX and Toyota RAV4 are both impressive entries in the compact SUV segment, but they cater to different audiences. The NX offers a more luxurious interior and advanced technology features, making it ideal for those seeking a premium experience. In contrast, the RAV4 stands out with its practicality, overall value, and strong reputation for reliability, appealing to budget-conscious buyers who still want a capable SUV.
Audi Q3
Lexus NX
VS
Is the Lexus NX offered with different drivetrains?

The Lexus NX is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.