Compare performance (442 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (64,200 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Maxus eTERRON 9 or KGM Musso?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
KGM Musso is considerably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Maxus eTERRON 9 costs 64,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,829 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Maxus eTERRON 9 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 240 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Maxus eTERRON 9 delivers visibly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 259 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso is clearly lighter – 2,070 kg compared to 2,925 kg. The difference is around 855 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso carries substantially more – 1,085 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 510 kg.
The Maxus eTERRON 9 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The eTERRON 9 stands out with its striking design and innovative features, making it a compelling choice for eco-conscious drivers. Its spacious interior and advanced technology provide a seamless driving experience that prioritizes both comfort and connectivity. With impressive efficiency and an array of smart capabilities, the eTERRON 9 is redefining what modern electric vehicles can offer.
details
The Musso is a rugged, no-nonsense pickup that balances practical utility with a comfortable cabin, making it equally at home on a jobsite or a weekend drive. It’s a sensible choice for drivers who want straightforward capability, durability and a reassuringly solid feel without unnecessary complexity.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,200 - 66,800 £
|
Price
33,400 - 44,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
8.5 - 9.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
430 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
223 - 246 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,925 - 2,955 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,997 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 575 kg
|
Payload
860 - 1,085 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
442 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
Torque
400 - 441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
325 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Maxus
|
Brand
KGM
|