Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Fiat Grande Panda – Differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Grande Panda has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16300 £, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24500 £. That’s a price difference of around 8271 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Grande Panda manages with 5.10 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a distinct edge – offering 186 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Fiat Grande Panda takes 10 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs evident better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Fiat Grande Panda tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 3 Hatchback pulls a bit stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, the Fiat Grande Panda is slight lighter – 1295 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 124 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Fiat Grande Panda offers slightly more room – 412 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 61 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Fiat Grande Panda performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1366 L, which is about 340 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback barely noticeable takes the win – 485 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

All in all, the Mazda 3 Hatchback shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It impresses with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile companion for everyday use.