Compare performance (186 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Honda HR-V?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing a vehicle that fits contemporary lifestyles, two names often pop up: the 2022 Honda HR-V and the 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback. With each bringing unique features to the table, this head-to-head comparison will help potential buyers identify which model best suits their needs.
The Honda HR-V, standing tall as an SUV, offers a spacious interior with a body length of 4340 mm and a height of 1582 mm. Its commanding presence is coupled with an elevated driving position, which many drivers find attractive for greater road visibility.
Contrastingly, the Mazda 3 Hatchback portrays a sportier silhouette, extending to 4460 mm in length, and possessing a sleeker height of 1435 mm. For those leaning towards aesthetics and aerodynamic form, the Mazda excels in combining elegance with utility.
Under the hood, the Honda HR-V features a full hybrid engine with 130 HP, whilst offering a torque of 253 Nm. This power unit, combined with a CVT transmission, provides smooth acceleration—reaching 0-100 km/h in around 10.6 seconds. The HR-V's focus is clearly on efficient fuel consumption, clocking at 5.4 L/100km, which is particularly appealing for those looking to reduce fuel costs.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback, however, ups the ante with its petrol MHEV engine offerings ranging up to 186 HP and delivering a torque of 240 Nm. The multiple transmission options, both manual and automatic, allow for a customized driving experience. With a sharper 0-100 km/h time as quick as 8 seconds, and a top speed rising up to 216 km/h, the Mazda prioritizes a spirited performance.
Both vehicles accommodate up to five passengers, ensuring comfortable rides for family outings or trips with friends. However, the HR-V's trunk capacity sits between 320 and 335 liters, offering a decent amount of space for luggage and gear, further supported by its SUV pedigree.
On the flip side, the Mazda 3 Hatchback provides 351 liters of trunk space, ensuring that it can handle bulkier loads without sacrificing passenger comfort. Its cabin layout is praised for its driver-centric design and premium material feel, enhancing the overall driving experience.
Environmental concerns remain a key factor for modern drivers. The HR-V sports a CO2 emission of 122 g/km, maintaining a respectable footprint in its segment. Coupled with its hybrid technology, it aims to offer both efficiency and reduced emissions.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback exhibits slightly higher CO2 figures, ranging from 126 to 146 g/km. However, its mild hybrid technologies do contribute to lowering environmental impact compared to conventional petrol engines, demonstrating Mazda's commitment to greener driving.
In conclusion, the decision between these two popular contenders largely depends on personal preferences and priorities. Those prioritizing fuel economy, a higher driving position, and hybrid technology may opt for the Honda HR-V. Meanwhile, drivers seeking a dynamic performance, sporty design, and a more hands-on driving experience may lean towards the Mazda 3 Hatchback. Both models excel in their own right, offering diverse benefits to cater to varied lifestyle needs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Honda HR-V costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,037 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda HR-V uses 5.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers markedly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda HR-V delivers marginally more torque with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is very slightly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,452 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers marginally more boot space – 351 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries moderately more – 502 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
The Honda HR-V is a compact crossover that blends practical versatility with a comfortable, refined cabin, making it a strong choice for daily driving and weekend trips. Its clever packaging and easy-to-use features give owners flexible cargo space and a confidence-inspiring driving experience without feeling fussy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
|
Price
29,100 - 34,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
122 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
1,452 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
487 - 502 kg
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España