Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport comparison
Compare performance (186 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 80,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
3 Hatchback
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 80,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 55,122 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses 2.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 364 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
3 Hatchback
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 973 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers clearly more boot space – 647 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 296 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport carries noticeably more – 830 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 328 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £80,100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda 3 Hatchback
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
|
Price
80,100 - 129,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
60 - 259 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,809 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
2,043 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
487 - 502 kg
|
Payload
641 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.