Compare performance (186 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Nissan Interstar?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,139 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers only slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers visibly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda 3 Hatchback offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is substantially lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 636 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 945 kg.
The Nissan Interstar holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
487 - 502 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|