VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Suzuki Swace?

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more efficient
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is markedly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers noticeably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

3 Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is only slightly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 58 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers clearly more boot space – 596 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 245 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries noticeably more – 502 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 142 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres

Reviews Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
j m
29 Jun 2026, 22:06:55

power
efficiency and low consumption
driving pleasure
wonderful e-drive and head-up projection display on the windshield

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
Ford Puma and Mazda 3 Hatchback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Puma or the Mazda …
Kia Ceed
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
In the dynamic world of hatchbacks, the Kia Ceed and Mazda 3 Hatchback go head-to-head, each offering distinct advantages. The Kia Ceed impresses with its efficient engine options and practical, spacious interior, making it a top contender for family drivers seeking reliability. On the other hand, …
Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Mazda CX-5
VS
Mazda 3 Hatchback and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda 3 Hatchback or …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Opel Corsa
VS
Mazda 3 Hatchback and Opel Corsa go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda 3 Hatchback or …
Audi A3 Sportback
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda 3 Hatchback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi A3 …
Ford Focus
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
The Ford Focus and Mazda 3 Hatchback both offer dynamic driving experiences, yet cater to slightly different tastes. The Ford Focus impresses with its responsive handling and practical technology features, making it a favorite for those seeking a balance between performance and economy. Meanwhile, …
Honda Jazz
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
In the competitive realm of compact hatchbacks, the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback each bring unique merits to the table. The Honda Jazz impresses with its clever interior packaging and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice for urban dwellers. Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 Hatchback …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
487 - 502 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.