VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Nissan Juke?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,592 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers slightly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is slightly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers very slightly more boot space – 450 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries moderately more – 481 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Sedan

Mazda 3 Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Mazda 3 Sedan
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Mazda 3 Sedan
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.