VS

Nissan Juke vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Renault Clio?

Nissan Juke vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Juke

Quick take: Nissan Juke VS Renault Clio — what this comparison is about

Nissan Juke VS Renault Clio pits a chunky, characterful city crossover against a more conventional, efficiency‑focused hatchback to help you decide which suits everyday life. The Nissan Juke leans on bold styling, a cockpit‑led interior and urban agility, while the Renault Clio stresses low running costs, grown‑up ride quality and modern connected tech. That contrast drives every other trade‑off here: the Juke trades some practicality and highway calm for personality and a driver‑centric feel, the Clio swaps flash for usable space and economical running. Read on for how those differences play out in cabins, comfort, usability and the real‑world needs of different buyers. This editorial sets the scene before you dig into the spec sheet and figures that clarify the exact margins between them.

Clio

Character and driving feel

The Nissan Juke feels like a city car that wants to be noticed; its steering is quick, the body control is eager and the whole package rewards short, dynamic runs around town. The Renault Clio, by contrast, aims for composure: steering that’s more measured, a calmer ride over longer distances and an overall temperament tuned for commuting rather than show. That means the Juke is more fun to hustle through tight streets and parking-lot maneuvers, while the Clio is the one you’ll pick for steady, fatigue‑free daily miles. Buyers who prioritise a punchy urban personality will prefer the Juke; those after relaxed, predictable behavior will favour the Clio.

Juke

Cabin feel and everyday usability

Inside, the Nissan Juke presents a cockpit‑forward layout with a large driver‑oriented screen and plenty of physical controls that make it click together like a simple, modern gadget. The Renault Clio’s cabin centres on a slick Google‑based infotainment experience and more mature material choices in higher trims, giving a sense of technological polish and clearer connectivity. Both cars still show cost‑saving touches in mid grades, but the Juke’s design makes the controls feel immediate while the Clio’s interface rewards tech‑savvy users who want seamless navigation and updates. If you like tactile knobs and a driver‑centric vibe pick the Juke; if seamless smartphone integration and long‑term software updates matter, the Clio edges ahead.

Clio

Practicality and family usability

Practical compromises are where the differences matter in daily life: the Nissan Juke trades a stylish silhouette for a tighter rear seat and a raised loading lip that makes frequent bulky loads a bit fiddly. The Renault Clio offers a more class‑typical boot and family‑friendly options like additional ISOFIX points, making it the more straightforward choice for parents and those who regularly carry child seats. Both cars suffer from limited rear visibility and a high deck when loading heavy items, but the Clio’s layout generally wins on predictable luggage space for everyday chores. Couples or singles who value appearance and a roomy front cabin will enjoy the Juke, whereas small families and commuters who need usable boot and flexibility will find the Clio more practical.

Juke

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long runs the Renault Clio feels the more relaxed companion: better sound insulation and a calmer ride make motorway miles less wearing and reduce cabin fatigue. The Nissan Juke can be lively on the move, but that liveliness comes with firmer suspension on larger wheels and more wind or tyre noise at speed, which becomes noticeable on extended trips. Both hybrids have transmission quirks under load, yet in day‑to‑day use the Clio’s setup generally masks them better across mixed routes. For buyers who do a lot of motorway commuting, the Clio’s steady demeanour will be the less tiring option, while the Juke suits those whose driving is mostly urban or short hops.

Clio

Who should choose which car — buyer fit and trade‑offs

If you want a city‑first car with personality, easy visual appeal and an engaging, button‑rich cabin, the Nissan Juke fits that brief and will please buyers prioritising style and urban agility. If your priorities are lower running costs, a quieter long‑distance ride, modern connected tech and slightly more everyday practicality, the Renault Clio makes more sense. The Juke is the smarter choice for image‑minded urban dwellers and second‑car buyers who value immediacy over absolute utility; the Clio is better for cost‑aware commuters, small families and anyone who prefers a steadier, more efficient daily driver. With those buyer fits clear, the technical comparison that follows will show exactly how engine, boot space and equipment translate into the real‑world margins between them.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is noticeably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,328 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers only slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Juke delivers very slightly more torque with 200 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is marginally lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 72 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers visibly more boot space – 422 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries very slightly more – 463 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Renault Clio means weighing practical space and proven reliability against a more stylish, comfort-focused hatch. I'll compare their driving dynamics, interior quality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday life.
Peugeot 208
Renault Clio
VS
In the dynamic world of compact hatchbacks, the Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio continue to capture the attention of drivers looking for style and efficiency. The Peugeot 208 stands out with its modern design and advanced connectivity features, offering a slightly sportier appeal. In contrast, the …
Fiat Panda
Renault Clio
VS
The Fiat Panda and Renault Clio are popular small cars that take very different approaches: the Panda focuses on practicality, rugged simplicity and roomy packaging for its size, while the Clio offers sharper styling, more refined driving and a tech-forward cabin. If you want easy ownership and …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
VW Taigo
VS
Nissan Juke and VW Taigo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the VW Taigo …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the small hatchback showdown, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek design and efficient engine, making it ideal for urban driving. On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a more rugged appeal with its crossover build, and enhanced driveability with its higher ride height and …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.