VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Nissan X-Trail comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Nissan X-Trail?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Sedan is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,180 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Sedan uses 5.5 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers slightly more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers significantly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is slightly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 248 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries a bit more – 574 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan X-Trail holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
X-Trail

Nissan X-Trail

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 213 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Mazda 3 Sedan
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
Mazda 3 Sedan
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.