VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan X-Trail comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Nissan X-Trail?

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan X-Trail is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,514 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers only slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is moderately lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries barely more – 612 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.