Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan X-Trail – Which model is better for everyday use?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Nissan X-Trail fits your lifestyle better.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan X-Trail has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34000 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 7877 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.30 L per 100 km.
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a evident edge – offering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Nissan X-Trail tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls minimal stronger with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is somewhat lighter – 1668 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers slight more room – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs somewhat better – up to 1726 L, which is about 302 L more than the Nissan X-Trail.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail stands out with its spacious interior and practical design, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure enthusiasts alike. Its sleek exterior styling is complemented by modern technology features that enhance both driving pleasure and safety. This versatile SUV offers a comfortable ride, whether navigating city streets or exploring off-road paths, ensuring you travel in style and comfort.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
34000 - 50400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4680 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1840 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1720 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1396 - 1424 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.