Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda 6 Estate vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (194 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Estate or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Mazda 6 Estate vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
6 Estate
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda 6 Estate is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,285 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda 6 Estate with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers visibly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mazda 6 Estate takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers considerably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 282 Nm more.
6 Estate
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Estate is visibly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 317 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda 6 Estate offers barely more boot space – 522 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries only slightly more – 600 kg compared to 571 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,300
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Mazda 6 Estate
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda 6 Estate
The Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Mazda 6 Estate
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
155 - 172 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
522 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
1,480 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
483 - 571 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.