Compare performance (258 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Nissan Interstar?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Interstar is barely cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Mazda 6 Saloon costs 38,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,326 £.
As for electric range, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers visibly more range – reaching up to 552 km, about 142 km more than the Nissan Interstar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers visibly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers a bit more torque with 380 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda 6 Saloon offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Saloon is marginally lighter – 2,027 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 26 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,087 kg.
The Mazda 6 Saloon comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|