VS

Mazda CX-30 vs BYD Atto 2 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 27,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or BYD Atto 2?

Mazda CX-30 vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
details

BYD Atto 2

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the BYD Atto 2 costs 27,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,186 £.

Atto 2

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 2 offers a bit more power – delivering 212 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 2 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.5 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 2 delivers noticeably more torque with 310 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 2 offers marginally more boot space – 450 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries marginally more – 496 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 2 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,400
Atto 2

BYD Atto 2

  • Engine Type : Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 166 - 212 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 40 - 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Dolphin
BYD Atto 2
VS
The BYD Dolphin and BYD Atto 2 represent two distinct EV choices from BYD: the Dolphin is a compact, city-oriented hatchback focused on efficiency and nimble urban driving, while the Atto 2 is a compact crossover offering more space, a higher driving position and richer tech. Choose the Dolphin for …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …
Mazda CX-30
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

BYD Atto 2

The BYD Atto 2 is a stylish compact electric SUV that blends bold exterior design with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it well suited to daily driving and urban life. It delivers a comfortable ride and practical features that will appeal to buyers looking for a modern, user-friendly EV.

details
atto2 Kopie
byd-atto2-interior-01-m

Reviews BYD Atto 2

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Carlos Aguilar
5 Feb 2026, 13:15:18

I've done 6,000 km and I'm delighted. I haven't tried other EVs, but I'm thrilled with the BYD Atto 2. It's true I don't go on long trips — I do everything in the city and nearby, about 100 to 150 km a day — and honestly it's been great in every way. When I hit 300,000 km I'll tell you again. Haha

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
Think of the MG4 as the affordable hot hatch of the EV world — compact, sharp-handling and great value for drivers who want a little grin in every corner, while the BYD Atto 2 is a chilled crossover, taller, roomier and packed with clever tech and impressive real-world range. If you want lively …
BYD Atto 2
MG MG4 Urban
VS
The BYD Atto 2 and the MG4 Urban are two popular compact EVs offering distinctive approaches to styling, range and value. This comparison will help you decide whether the Atto 2’s roomy, comfort-focused cabin and clever tech or the MG4 Urban’s sharper driving dynamics and hatchback practicality …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Kia EV3
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Kia EV3 feels like a grown-up, sporty compact EV with sharper handling, nicer interior materials and cleaner infotainment, while the BYD Atto 2 trades that polish for a quirky cabin, longer range and an irresistible price tag. If you want everyday driving refinement and a bit of fun, pick the …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Toyota Yaris Cross
BYD Atto 2
VS
Picking between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the BYD Atto 2 means choosing between two very different approaches to compact crossover motoring. The Yaris Cross brings Toyota's compact hybrid efficiency, fuss‑free practicality and strong resale appeal, while the BYD Atto 2 offers a fully electric, …
BYD Atto 2
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The BYD Atto 2 feels like a techy, upmarket compact SUV — polished cabin, clever range and quirky styling that turns heads, making it the pick if you want EV swagger and gadgets. The MG MGS5 EV answers with straightforward practicality and a friendlier price tag, trading a bit of polish for roomy …
Toyota C-HR
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Toyota C‑HR and BYD Atto 2 represent two different takes on the compact crossover: the C‑HR emphasizes bold styling and Toyota’s proven hybrid/petrol options, while the Atto 2 offers a contemporary, fully electric package with strong tech for the price. I’ll compare driving dynamics, …
Mazda CX-30
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
27,400 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 41 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
260 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
BYD
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.