What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Mercedes EQA deliver on the road?

The Mercedes EQA reaches a peak output of 292 HP, depending on the model.

What are the Mercedes EQA’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Mercedes EQA consumes around 14.40 kWh.

What is the Mercedes EQA’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 561 km.

How large is the Mercedes EQA’s battery?

The Mercedes EQA comes with a 70.50 kWh battery.

How many liters of cargo space does the Mercedes EQA offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 340 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mercedes EQA?

Overall, the Mercedes EQA is 4463 mm long, 1834 mm wide and 1608 mm high.

Mazda CX-5 vs Mercedes EQA – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 14237 £.

EQA @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a convincingly edge – offering 292 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 4.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs to a small extent better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls significantly stronger with 520 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 282 Nm difference.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is noticeable lighter – 1629 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 416 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers decisively more room – 583 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs distinct better – up to 2019 L, which is about 699 L more than the Mercedes EQA.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes EQA shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda CX-5

3 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

VS

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …

@ BMW Group Press

BMW iX1

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes EQA

VS

The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …

Costs and Consumption
Price 30000 - 39500 £	Price 44200 - 57400 £
Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 14.4 - 16.9 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 476 - 561 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 70.50 kWh
co2 157 - 168 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg	Curb weight 2045 - 2115 kg
Trunk capacity 583 L	Trunk capacity 340 L
Length 4690 mm	Length 4463 mm
Width 1860 mm	Width 1834 mm
Height 1695 mm	Height 1608 - 1613 mm
Max trunk capacity 2019 L	Max trunk capacity 1320 L
Payload -	Payload 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 141 HP	Power HP 190 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed 195 km/h	Max Speed 160 km/h
Torque 238 Nm	Torque 385 - 520 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 104 kW	Power kW 140 - 215 kW
Engine capacity 2488 cm3	Engine capacity -