VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Mazda CX-5 vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,343 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers substantially more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers considerably more torque with 238 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 136 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 689 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers considerably more boot space – 466 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 231 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 201 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-5 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
VS
Comparing the Jaguar F‑Pace and the Mazda CX‑5 pits a sporty, luxury-oriented midsize SUV against a sharply styled, value-focused compact crossover — a matchup of premium feel and driving dynamics versus everyday practicality and efficiency. Choose the F‑Pace if you prioritize performance, brand …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-5 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and driving dynamics. While the Sportage offers a spacious interior and an array of advanced tech features, the CX-5 is celebrated for its engaging handling and upscale cabin …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the SEAT Ateca …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the crowded SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai vie for attention with their distinct offering to drivers. The Mazda CX-5 stands out with its refined handling and upscale interior, delivering a premium feel that rivals more expensive models. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai impresses with …
Hyundai i10
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Hyundai i10 impresses with its stylish design and user-friendly tech features, making it a top choice for urban drivers. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers a spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, catering well to those seeking …
Mazda CX-5
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.