Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Juke - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (141 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (30000 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Juke?
CX-5
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Juke has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8615 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.
Juke
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 143 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 10.10 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs minimal better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-5 pulls a bit stronger with 238 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-5
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is distinct lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 355 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers noticeable more room – 583 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs evident better – up to 2019 L, which is about 714 L more than the Nissan Juke.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Juke is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £21,400
Nissan Juke
Mazda CX-5
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Nissan Juke
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30000 - 39500 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
583 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4690 mm
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?
The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.