VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Primastar Transporter comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 43,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Primastar Transporter?

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Primastar Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Nissan Primastar Transporter

  • somewhat more power
  • only slightly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Transporter costs 43,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,532 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Primastar Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Primastar Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Primastar Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Primastar Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Primastar Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is slightly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,926 kg. The difference is around 297 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Primastar Transporter carries significantly more – 1,110 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 509 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Primastar Transporter comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,500
Primastar Transporter

Nissan Primastar Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.8 - 7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Primastar Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Primastar Transporter

The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.

details
serpimg_SGxNPL

Reviews Nissan Primastar Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda 6 Estate or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Opel Grandland
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and sporty handling, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Opel Grandland offers a more practical approach, with a spacious interior and advanced tech features aimed at family comfort. …
Nissan Primastar Transporter
Renault Trafic Transporter
VS
Nissan Primastar Transporter and Renault Trafic Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Primastar Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
178 - 184 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.