VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Peugeot Partner comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 26,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Peugeot Partner?

Mazda CX-5 vs Peugeot Partner: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Peugeot Partner

  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Peugeot Partner is moderately cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,879 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot Partner uses 5.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

Partner

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers only slightly more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Peugeot Partner takes 11.2 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Partner delivers clearly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 62 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-5 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Partner is a bit lighter – 1,371 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 258 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Partner carries markedly more – 781 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot Partner is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,100
Partner

Peugeot Partner

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 354 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Peugeot Partner

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot Partner

The Peugeot Partner is a no-nonsense workhorse that doubles as a surprisingly comfy family mover, combining clever storage solutions with an easy-to-live-in cabin. It won’t win any beauty contests, but for small businesses and active families it’s practical, economical and utterly reliable when the day gets busy.

details
PEUGEOT_PARTNER_PRO-SKILL_2509CGI_201_FR
PEUGEOT_PARTNER_PRO-SKILL_2509CGI_200_FR
PEUGEOT_PAR_2310GJ_303

Reviews Peugeot Partner

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot Partner
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Peugeot Partner and the Peugeot Rifter are closely related but aimed at different buyers: the Partner is a practical small van focused on load-carrying and work use, while the Rifter is the more passenger-oriented, lifestyle MPV version. I’ll compare their space, comfort, driving character and …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Peugeot Partner
Toyota Proace City
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot Partner and the Toyota Proace City comes down to whether you prioritise clever interior packaging and comfort (Partner) or straightforward reliability, simplicity and low running costs (Proace City). This short comparison will focus on load space, practicality, fuel …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Opel Combo
Peugeot Partner
VS
The Vauxhall Combo and Peugeot Partner are closely related small vans that share the same platform and many mechanicals, but they present different strengths in styling, trim and dealer support. This comparison will show where each model wins on practicality, comfort, running costs and value so you …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 …
Mazda CX-5
Peugeot Partner

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
26,100 - 33,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
354 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,371 - 1,674 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
645 - 781 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
250 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.