VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Trafic Transporter?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • somewhat more power
  • barely more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,106 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Trafic Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Trafic Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Trafic Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 219 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries clearly more – 1,222 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 621 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Trafic Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,100
Trafic Transporter

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 240 - 318 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details
serpimg_zzYFEX

Reviews Renault Trafic Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Mazda CX-5
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Mazda CX-5 and Toyota Corolla Cross, both vehicles showcase distinct strengths tailored to different drivers' preferences. The sporty design and engaging driving dynamics of the CX-5 cater to those seeking a more spirited ride, while the Corolla Cross emphasizes …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-5 offer distinct experiences for drivers. The Ford Puma, known for its agile handling and sporty design, appeals to those craving a dynamic driving experience in urban environments. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its luxurious …
Mazda CX-5
Peugeot 3008
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sporty performance and premium interior, making it a strong contender against the stylish Peugeot 3008. While the CX-5 offers a dynamic driving experience and impressive handling, the Peugeot 3008 captivates with its sleek …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 184 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.