VS

Mazda CX-5 vs VW T-Cross – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or VW T-Cross?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 8923 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Cross manages with 5.40 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Cross has a minimal edge – offering 150 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Cross performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Cross pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.

CX-5 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is evident lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 362 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly perceptible more room – 583 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 128 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs evident better – up to 2019 L, which is about 738 L more than the VW T-Cross.

Who wins the race?

The VW T-Cross proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW T-Cross is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £21,100
DB2021AU01108_medium

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L
details

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 exemplifies the perfect blend of style and practicality, offering a sleek design that turns heads while providing ample space for passengers and luggage. Its refined interior boasts high-quality materials and a user-friendly interface, making every journey a comfortable experience. With its engaging driving dynamics, the CX-5 delivers both performance and efficiency, appealing to drivers who crave excitement and reliability.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1) @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1 @ de.mazda-press.com

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross stands out as a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with style. Its interior design offers a spacious and flexible layout, ideal for both city driving and weekend adventures. With its modern infotainment system, the T-Cross ensures drivers and passengers stay connected throughout their journeys.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium feel; pick the Karoq if practicality, lower running costs and smarter packaging win your heart.
Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Cross
CX-5
T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
30000 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
583 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
-
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.50 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive cargo capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize luxury or versatility in their everyday driving experiences.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitively growing subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinct offerings. The Yaris Cross boasts impressive hybrid efficiency and a rugged design, catering to environmentally conscious buyers seeking adventure. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels in interior space and advanced technology, appealing to urban drivers looking for practicality without sacrificing style.
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, the T-Cross presents a more robust option with its SUV-inspired design, offering increased space and versatility perfect for active families seeking a practical yet stylish vehicle.
VW T-Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior quality. Ultimately, choosing between these two compact SUVs comes down to personal preference, as both models deliver a compelling driving experience tailored to diverse lifestyles.
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and high-tech features, provides a pragmatic approach to everyday driving, emphasizing practicality and modernity.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.