VS

Mazda CX-5 vs XPeng P7 comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 473 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or XPeng P7?

Mazda CX-5 vs XPeng P7: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

XPeng P7

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the XPeng P7 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,523 £.

P7

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7 offers significantly more power – delivering 473 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 332 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7 delivers significantly more torque with 757 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 519 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is markedly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,020 kg. The difference is around 391 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries visibly more – 601 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 171 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
P7

XPeng P7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 276 - 473 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 505 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng P7
XPeng P7+
VS
The XPeng P7 and P7+ are closely related electric sedans, with the P7+ positioned as a higher-spec variant that builds on the standard P7’s strengths. This short comparison highlights the key differences in range, performance, features and value to help you pick the one that best matches your …
BYD Seal
XPeng P7
VS
The BYD Seal and the XPeng P7 are two of the most compelling electric sedans on the market, offering a mix of range, performance and advanced tech tailored to modern drivers. I’ll compare their driving dynamics, range, interior quality, charging and ownership costs so you can see which one fits …
Mazda CX-5
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

XPeng P7

The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.

details
xpeng-p7-front1
xpeng-p7-rear
xpeng-p7-inter1

Reviews XPeng P7

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
Christian
26 Aug 2026, 05:27:51

The future of AI mobility .. - that pretty much says it all about the XPENG P7+.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
SvenP
15 Jul 2026, 15:50:04

xpeng p7i is overall more practical - it's just not available with 1000 hp - but in the Performance variant 470+ hp are enough, and many gimmicks are better implemented on the P7i

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
AD
14 Dec 2025, 06:11:35

Awesome car. I have the P7 Performance with the Premium package in black and am very satisfied!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-5 comes down to whether you prioritize roomy practicality and efficiency or sharper driving dynamics and a more premium cabin. The ZR-V leans toward user-friendly space, good fuel economy and value, while the CX-5 delivers engaging handling, stronger …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
XPeng G6
XPeng P7
VS
XPeng G6 and XPeng P7 could not be more different in character: the G6 is a roomy, high-riding crossover built for family comfort and gadget-packed practicality, while the P7 remains a sleek, low-slung electric coupe-saloon that rewards you with sharper handling and a more driver-focused feel. Both …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Mazda CX-5
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
42,500 - 50,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
82.7 kWh
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,020 - 2,140 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
440 L
Length
-
Length
4,888 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,896 mm
Height
-
Height
1,450 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
430 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
XPeng
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.