Compare performance (327 HP vs 530 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or BYD Sealion 7?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The SUV market is teeming with options that strive to satisfy the modern driver’s thirst for performance, comfort, and environmental consciousness. In this arena, two standout contenders—Mazda’s CX-60 and BYD’s Sealion 7—take the spotlight. Let’s dive into their technical prowess and innovative features that set them apart.
Both the Mazda CX-60 and the BYD Sealion 7 offer impressive performances but cater to different preferences. The Mazda CX-60 comes with an array of engine options, including a plug-in hybrid with 327 HP and a diesel MHEV variant delivering between 200 and 254 HP. Its acceleration varies across models, with the plug-in hybrid impressively sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds.
On the other hand, the Sealion 7 shines in the electric vehicle realm with power outputs of 313 HP and even reaching a thrilling 530 HP for its high-performance variant. The Sealion 7’s electric model can move from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 4.5 seconds, substantially quicker than its hybrid opponent.
Efficiency is where these two SUVs tell different stories. The CX-60’s plug-in hybrid model offers an electric range of 64 km, coupled with a combined fuel consumption as low as 1.4 L/100km, ensuring flexibility for various driving needs.
The Sealion 7, being fully electric, boasts an impressive range of up to 502 km on a single charge. Its consumption varies between 19.9 and 21.9 kWh/100 km, showcasing strong efficiency that makes it a winner in the eco-friendly category with a CO2 efficiency class rating of ‘A’.
Design and space considerations are crucial for SUVs. The CX-60 stretches 4,745 mm in length, with a width of 1,890 mm and a height reaching up to 1,688 mm, offering a substantial trunk capacity of 570 liters. It seats five comfortably, providing ample space for passengers and luggage.
Similarly, the Sealion 7 is slightly larger, measuring 4,830 mm in length and 1,925 mm in width, albeit shorter at 1,620 mm in height. While its trunk capacity is slightly less at 520 liters, it maintains a spacious and futuristic interior design aligning with its electric identity.
Mazda CX-60 models are available with both all-wheel and rear-wheel drive configurations, catering to diverse driving preferences. Its robust torque ratings of up to 550 Nm ensure a dynamic driving experience. With a curb weight ranging from 1,890 to 2,055 kg, it balances between power and efficiency.
The Sealion 7, available in rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, features significant torque, especially in its powerful version, reaching up to 690 Nm. Despite a heavier curb weight of up to 2,435 kg, its driving dynamics remain responsive and agile, thanks to advanced electric propulsion systems.
The decision between the Mazda CX-60 and the BYD Sealion 7 often boils down to personal driving priorities. The Mazda CX-60 offers a compelling choice for those who appreciate hybrid efficiency combined with a trusted brand legacy. Conversely, the BYD Sealion 7 makes a compelling case for tech-savvy drivers passionate about zero emissions and cutting-edge electric performance.
Both models exemplify innovation and progress, setting new benchmarks in the ever-evolving SUV landscape. Whichever route you choose, you’re bound to experience the peak of automotive ingenuity.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Sealion 7 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 823 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Sealion 7 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 502 km, about 439 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Sealion 7 offers noticeably more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 203 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Sealion 7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Sealion 7 delivers noticeably more torque with 690 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,225 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more boot space – 570 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries clearly more – 612 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 202 kg.
The BYD Sealion 7 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The BYD Sealion 7 is a sleek electric wagon that blends sporty styling with surprising practicality, making it a compelling choice for drivers who want something different from the usual hatchback or SUV. Its refined interior and composed road manners give it an upscale feel, while clever packaging keeps it versatile for daily use.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
42,800 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.9 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
456 - 502 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,225 - 2,435 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,925 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
313 - 530 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 690 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
230 - 390 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España