VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Ford Kuga comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Ford Kuga?

Mazda CX-60 vs Ford Kuga: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-60

Ford Kuga VS Mazda CX-60 — quick take

Ford Kuga VS Mazda CX-60 sets up a clear personality clash: the Kuga is the more driver-focused, tech-forward compact SUV while the CX-60 pitches semi‑premium build, long‑distance calm and serious towing/boot capability. The Kuga feels livelier around town and on twisty roads, with a roomy, flexible rear seat at the heart of its everyday appeal. The CX-60 trades that immediacy for thicker materials, a more composed motorway demeanour and a much larger, easier-to-use luggage area. Buyers will recognise this as a trade-off between agile practicality (Kuga) and hushed, utility-focused refinement (CX-60).

Kuga

Character and driving feel

The Ford Kuga leans toward a sharper, more engaging drive — steering is direct and the chassis rewards a brisk cornering pace, which makes it feel smaller and more entertaining than its format suggests. In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 is engineered for steadiness: it feels heavier and more planted, prioritising low‑effort high‑speed stability over sporty responses. The Kuga’s hybrid systems can sound strained under hard acceleration, reminding you it’s tuned for efficiency first; the CX-60’s larger engines deliver effortless shove and a calmer, more linear pull. If you prefer a car that invites enthusiastic driving choose the Kuga; if you favour relaxed, assured progress choose the CX-60.

CX-60

Cabin, controls and perceived quality

The Kuga’s interior is functional and tech-rich, highlighted by a big central screen and modern connectivity, but many surfaces feel utilitarian and the all-touch climate controls can be fiddly while driving. Mazda CX-60 counters with noticeably higher-grade materials and a quieter, more composed cabin ambience that reads closer to premium rivals, though its conservative rotary control takes longer to master than a touchscreen. In daily life the Kuga feels younger and more gadget-forward; the CX-60 feels crafted and restrained which makes longer trips feel a touch more special. If tactile luxury and finish matter, the CX-60 will satisfy more; if smart phones and instant connectivity are your priority, the Kuga is the more immediate choice.

Kuga

Practicality and day-to-day usability

The Ford Kuga wins on flexible family practicality: a sliding rear bench, generous rear legroom and easy ingress/egress make it a better companion for school runs, variable cargo loads and tight urban parking. Mazda CX-60 answers with a genuinely large boot and a load floor designed for real luggage or towing kit, plus a higher official towing capability that matters if you tow trailers or boats. In town the Kuga’s lighter feel and city-optimised hybrid variants deliver lower running costs and simpler manoeuvring, whereas the CX-60’s width and heavier steering make cramped streets more of a task. Families who frequently haul bulky items or tow will tip toward the CX-60, while those needing everyday versatility and city efficiency will prefer the Kuga.

CX-60

Long-distance behaviour and noise

On the motorway the Mazda CX-60 shows its strengths: composed ride, low noise levels and a diesel or larger petrol powertrain that maintains relaxed cruising without needing to be worked. The Ford Kuga is surprisingly quiet at steady speeds too, but its hybrid drive can become intrusive when you ask for strong acceleration, which dents serenity during overtakes. The CX-60’s firmer ride over sharp imperfections still pays dividends in stability at speed, whereas the Kuga’s setup favours nimbleness but can feel harsher on poor surfaces. Choose the CX-60 for long-haul calm and towing confidence; choose the Kuga if you want a crisper, more engaging car on varied roads.

Kuga

Buyer fit and trade-offs — who should test drive which

If you’re a commuter or family who values agility, lower urban running costs and a flexible cabin, the Ford Kuga will feel like the smarter everyday companion and is also kinder to the wallet at purchase. If your priority is perceived quality, big luggage capacity, long-distance comfort and towing capability, the Mazda CX-60 will repay you with a more premium feel and a stronger long‑haul temperament. Both have compromises: the Kuga sacrifices some material polish and pure boot space for liveliness, while the CX-60 asks you to accept a firmer ride and a heavier footprint in exchange for quality and utility. The technical comparison that follows will unpack engines, efficiency, weights and boot usability so you can convert these real‑world impressions into the numbers that matter for your decision.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,429 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 5 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Kuga

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details
Mazda CX-60
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Mazda CX-60
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
55 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
541 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.