Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 78,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-60 is considerably cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,929 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses 2.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers significantly more range – reaching up to 118 km, about 55 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 223 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers visibly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is visibly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 500 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers slightly more boot space – 647 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport carries noticeably more – 830 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 218 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £78,600
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
78,600 - 129,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
60 - 259 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,809 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,043 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
641 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.