Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Lynk & Co 01 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (327 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (43700 £ vs 36900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Lynk & Co 01?
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Lynk & Co 01 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36900 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6819 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 01 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 01 performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 75 km, about 12 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
01
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a somewhat edge – offering 327 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.70 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 535 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1890 kg compared to 1935 kg. The difference is around 45 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers to a small extent more room – 570 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 clearly perceptible takes the win – 612 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 197 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Lynk & Co 01 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lynk & Co 01 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,900
Lynk & Co 01
Mazda CX-60
Lynk & Co 01
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Lynk & Co 01
5 (2 Reviews)
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
Mazda CX-60
Lynk & Co 01
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43700 - 57900 £
|
Price
36900 - 40300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.