VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes GLC comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 50,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes GLC?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes GLC: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is moderately cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,656 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLC uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC offers substantially more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 651 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

GLC

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers markedly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 162 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC delivers visibly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,985 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers very slightly more boot space – 620 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries only slightly more – 612 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £50,300
GLC

Mercedes GLC

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 489 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 122 - 714 km
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
122 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 214 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
475 - 575 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
186 - 489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
380 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
137 - 360 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.