Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,889 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 411 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Vito Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers only slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is only slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 26 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries clearly more – 884 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 272 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Transporter stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £28,800
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.