Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Vauxhall Grandland – Differences & prices compared
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Vauxhall Grandland fits your lifestyle better.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Vauxhall Grandland has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32600 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 9343 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Vauxhall Grandland with 2.60 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Vauxhall Grandland performs significantly better – achieving up to 694 km, about 630 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Grandland
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a minimal edge – offering 327 HP compared to 325 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Vauxhall Grandland takes 6.10 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Vauxhall Grandland performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 509 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Vauxhall Grandland is a bit lighter – 1675 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers barely noticeable more room – 570 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1726 L, which is about 81 L more than the Vauxhall Grandland.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 to a small extent takes the win – 612 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Vauxhall Grandland
The Opel Grandland feels like a sensible, well-rounded SUV — neat styling, a spacious cabin and a composed ride that turns daily driving into a quietly pleasant experience. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want modern tech, good economy and a dash of German practicality without shouting for attention.
details
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Mazda CX-60
Vauxhall Grandland
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
32600 - 51400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
82 - 694 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1675 - 2325 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
485 - 550 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4650 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1905 - 1934 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 - 1645 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
425 - 495 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 509 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.