VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Scala comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Scala?

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Scala: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Skoda Scala

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Scala is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Skoda Scala with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.2 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is clearly lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 691 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 467 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries clearly more – 612 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 181 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Scala

The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.

details
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114931
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114932
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114933
Der neue SKODA SCALA Interieur_114994

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
Herr der Ringe
22 Jun 2026, 13:30:53

Sporty with plenty of space, slightly larger than the Golf 7

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Skoda Scala
VW Taigo
VS
The Skoda Scala and the VW Taigo are two popular compact choices: the Scala a roomy, value-focused hatchback and the Taigo a style-led small crossover with a higher driving position. This comparison concentrates on space, comfort, driving character, economy and features to help you pick whether you …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
SEAT Leon
Skoda Scala
VS
SEAT Leon and Skoda Scala go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the SEAT Leon or the Skoda Scala …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.