Compare performance (327 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Superb Combi?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of automotive excellence, two contenders emerge with distinctive charms: the Mazda CX-60, a sophisticated SUV, and the Skoda Superb Combi, an elegant wagon. As we delve into their technical intricacies and innovations, these vehicles display a remarkable array of features poised to capture discerning hearts.
The Mazda CX-60 showcases a robust portfolio, offering multiple engine types including a cutting-edge Plugin Hybrid and Diesel MHEV options. Its power spectrum peaks at an impressive 327 HP in the hybrid variant, promising a spirited 0-100 km/h acceleration in a brisk 5.8 seconds. A 64 km electric range ensures daily commutes are both thrilling and ecologically conscious.
On the other hand, the Skoda Superb Combi boasts an array of engine choices, including Petrol MHEV, Diesel, and Plugin Hybrid options. The top-end delivers 265 HP and reaches 100 km/h from rest in a swift 5.7 seconds, rivaling its Mazda counterpart. Additionally, the Plugin Hybrid offers an expansive electric range of up to 134 km, combining potency with sustainability.
Staying sustainable, the Mazda CX-60 Plugin Hybrid model records a sympathetic 1.4 L/100km fuel consumption and CO2 emissions as low as 32 g/km, reflecting its B-rating CO2 efficiency class. Meanwhile, Skoda's innovative hybrid tech in the Superb Combi achieves a remarkable 0.4 L/100km with CO2 emissions at an impressive low of 9 g/km, securing its standing in the efficiency class B category.
Navigating urban landscapes and off-road paths, the Mazda CX-60 epitomizes the distinctive aura of an SUV with a length of 4745 mm and heightened stance at 1686 mm, matched by an expansive width of 1890 mm. Offering ample storage, it hosts a trunk capacity of 570 liters.
Conversely, the Skoda Superb Combi lends a sleeker silhouette, characterized by dimensions of 4902 mm in length and a 1521 mm height, blending elegance with storage convenience, boasting a capacious 690 liters trunk volume—a compelling choice for the pragmatic driver in pursuit of space and style.
Within the Mazda CX-60, drivers revel in the automatic gearbox's precision, with all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive setups available to suit diverse terrains and user preferences. This flexibility enhances control and confidence on various journeys.
The Skoda Superb Combi equally impresses with its dual-clutch automatic transmission, facilitating smooth transitions and an invigorating drive. Front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations further this model's adaptability, ensuring command whether meandering through city streets or conquering open roads.
In this clash of titans, both the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Superb Combi offer compelling narratives of performance, efficiency, and style. The choice between them resonates with individual lifestyle aspirations and driving experiences, from the high-spirited dynamism of Mazda's SUV ingenuity to the spacious sophistication inherent within Skoda's wagon craftsmanship. As they stand ready for the 2024 adventure, these models continue to push the boundaries, capturing imaginations with every turn of the wheel.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Superb Combi is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,586 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Combi offers substantially more range – reaching up to 137 km, about 74 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is moderately lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 315 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers slightly more boot space – 690 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries very slightly more – 612 kg compared to 584 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Skoda Superb Combi is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España