VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Suzuki Swace?

Mazda CX-60 vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swace is noticeably cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,794 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 187 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is noticeably lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 415 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers marginally more boot space – 596 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries substantially more – 612 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 252 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
Nikola
4 Aug 2026, 09:35:09

The car is simply fantastic. The torque is unbelievable. Acceleration is mesmerizing for an SUV. The interior has a premium feel. The only thing that would make it better is a longer EV range. Otherwise, perfect.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Lexus NX or the Mazda CX-60 …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-60 or the VW Tiguan …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
Mazda CX-60
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.