Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda CX-60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (36900 £ vs 43700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Mazda CX-60?
Terramar
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
CUPRA Terramar has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36900 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6797 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: CUPRA Terramar manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the CUPRA Terramar performs clearly better – achieving up to 118 km, about 55 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a slightly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.90 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Terramar
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is a bit lighter – 1638 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 252 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers barely noticeable more room – 570 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 to a small extent takes the win – 612 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The CUPRA Terramar is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,900
CUPRA Terramar
CUPRA Terramar
5 (3 Reviews)
The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.
details
Mazda CX-60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36900 - 50600 £
|
Price
43700 - 57900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1638 - 1904 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4519 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1869 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1586 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Mazda
|
What drivetrain options does the CUPRA Terramar have?
The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.