VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota Land Cruiser comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 72,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Toyota Land Cruiser?

Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota Land Cruiser: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

Toyota Land Cruiser

  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 is substantially cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 72,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,320 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.6 L/100km. The difference is about 6.8 L/100km.

Land Cruiser

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.3 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers only slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Toyota Land Cruiser offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is markedly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,415 kg. The difference is around 525 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers visibly more boot space – 742 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Land Cruiser carries slightly more – 750 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota Land Cruiser

The Toyota Land Cruiser is the kind of SUV that makes you feel ready to abandon the map and take the long way home, with legendary go-anywhere capability wrapped in reassuringly solid build quality. Inside it's surprisingly comfortable and grown-up — a practical luxury for buyers who want reliability and presence rather than fleeting flash.

details
2025_Toyota_Land_Cruiser_002
2025_Toyota_LandCruiser_1958_MeteorShower_002
2025_Toyota_Land_Cruiser_014

Reviews Toyota Land Cruiser

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Hilux
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
When the workday ends and the map turns savage, few showdowns matter more than the Toyota Hilux vs Toyota Land Cruiser. One's a no-nonsense pickup that eats mud for breakfast and keeps going; the other's a regal off-road veteran that swallows long journeys and luggage without complaint — we'll pit …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Nissan X-Trail compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-60
VS
Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
72,000 - 79,700 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
278 - 282 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,415 - 2,450 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,980 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
685 - 750 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
151 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,755 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.