VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes GLC EQ?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,770 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers clearly more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 654 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

GLC EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers noticeably more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 162 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers substantially more boot space – 570 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 312 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 645 - 714 km
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.