VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Omoda 9 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Omoda 9?

Mazda CX-80 vs Omoda 9: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally lighter
details

Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 9 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 45,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,986 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 9 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 9 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 145 km, about 85 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

9

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers markedly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 9 delivers a bit more torque with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is marginally lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Omoda 9 offers considerably more boot space – 471 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 213 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 9 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£45,342
9

Omoda 9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 537 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 145 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 08
Omoda 9
VS
The Lynk & Co 08 and the Omoda 9 are two fresh contenders in the compact SUV segment, each promising standout styling, modern tech and family-friendly space. This quick comparison focuses on the real differences in driving feel, interior quality, fuel efficiency and value so you can decide which …
XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
Mazda CX-80
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details
IMG_3964
IMG_3965

Reviews Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Tommy
11 Jun 2026, 08:29:12

I recently bought the Omoda 9 — it's a premium car at the right price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG MGS9
Omoda 9
VS
The MG MGS9 and Omoda 9 are two bold, tech-focused SUVs from rising Chinese brands, both aimed at buyers who want roomy interiors, strong equipment levels and distinct styling without premium-brand prices. This comparison looks past the headlines to help you choose which one fits your …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
BYD Sealion 7
Omoda 9
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and Omoda 9 are direct rivals in the modern, tech-forward family car space, each promising strong value, roomy cabins and a long feature list. This comparison will help you see how the Sealion 7’s approach to efficiency and refinement stacks up against the Omoda 9’s emphasis on …
BYD Seal U
Omoda 9
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Omoda 9 pits BYD’s sleek, tech-focused electric contender against Omoda’s bold, well-equipped midsize SUV — two very different takes on modern motoring. This quick head-to-head will help you decide whether you value the Seal U’s electric efficiency and advanced tech …
Skoda Kodiaq
Omoda 9
VS
Skoda Kodiaq and Omoda 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Kodiaq or the Omoda 9 …
Toyota RAV4
Omoda 9
VS
The RAV4 and the Omoda 9 represent two distinct approaches to the compact SUV: the RAV4 is a well-proven, practical choice with strong resale and dealer support, while the Omoda 9 brings bold styling and a tech-rich package at a competitive price. This short comparison will help you weigh long-term …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mercedes GLC
Omoda 9
VS
Mercedes GLC and Omoda 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes GLC or the Omoda 9 …
Mazda CX-80
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
145 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
38 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
471 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
537 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
395 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Omoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.